<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Importer Entitled to Duty Refund on Unclaimed Goods, Payment Timing Doesn&#039;t Affect Legal Rights.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34058</link>
    <description>Whether the duty already paid by the appellant in respect of goods imported by them can be claimed as refund in the case of non-clearance of the same? - Held Yes - Merely because the importer has already deposited the duty instead of waiting for the adjudication order, will not change the legal issue - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:58:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Importer Entitled to Duty Refund on Unclaimed Goods, Payment Timing Doesn&#039;t Affect Legal Rights.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34058</link>
      <description>Whether the duty already paid by the appellant in respect of goods imported by them can be claimed as refund in the case of non-clearance of the same? - Held Yes - Merely because the importer has already deposited the duty instead of waiting for the adjudication order, will not change the legal issue - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:58:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>