<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1433 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s decision to deny Cenvat credit on input services related to stock transfers between manufacturing units. It ruled that granting credit in Jaipur where goods were transferred would result in double benefit since credit was already availed in the units of original manufacture. The Tribunal found no legal basis for allowing credit on services twice and dismissed the appeals, affirming the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1433 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s decision to deny Cenvat credit on input services related to stock transfers between manufacturing units. It ruled that granting credit in Jaipur where goods were transferred would result in double benefit since credit was already availed in the units of original manufacture. The Tribunal found no legal basis for allowing credit on services twice and dismissed the appeals, affirming the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>