https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340927 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Custom House Agent (CHA) appellant and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The impugned order of forfeiture of security deposit from the CHA was set aside due to non-compliance with time limits under the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulation 2013. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of time limits in legal proceedings, stating that failure to adhere to such limits renders proceedings invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order could not be legally sustained, leading to the favorable outcome for the CHA appellant. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:58:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340927 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Custom House Agent (CHA) appellant and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The impugned order of forfeiture of security deposit from the CHA was set aside due to non-compliance with time limits under the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulation 2013. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of time limits in legal proceedings, stating that failure to adhere to such limits renders proceedings invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order could not be legally sustained, leading to the favorable outcome for the CHA appellant. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340927