https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340924 The High Court upheld the DVAT Tribunal's order directing a 25% pre-deposit instead of the initial 50%, pending the Supreme Court's decision on the applicability of Section 74A of the Delhi VAT Act. The Court allowed the Tribunal to proceed with the appeals after the reduced pre-deposit, emphasizing that the Tribunal should assess if the Assessing Officer's order was erroneous or prejudicial. The outcome of the appeals and Revenue's orders would be subject to the Supreme Court's judgment, binding the parties. The writ petitions were disposed of based on these terms. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:58:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340924 The High Court upheld the DVAT Tribunal's order directing a 25% pre-deposit instead of the initial 50%, pending the Supreme Court's decision on the applicability of Section 74A of the Delhi VAT Act. The Court allowed the Tribunal to proceed with the appeals after the reduced pre-deposit, emphasizing that the Tribunal should assess if the Assessing Officer's order was erroneous or prejudicial. The outcome of the appeals and Revenue's orders would be subject to the Supreme Court's judgment, binding the parties. The writ petitions were disposed of based on these terms. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340924