<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Questions Justification for Detaining Goods and Vehicle After Prior Attachment of Rs. 1.60 Crore Worth Goods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34065</link>
    <description>Detention of goods with vehicle - subsequently order of attachment was passed - is detention justified? - the department has already attached other goods worth &amp;#8377; 1.60 crores, lying in the petitioner&#039;s godown. Additional attachment of the consignment of the goods in question therefore would not be necessary. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:57:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Questions Justification for Detaining Goods and Vehicle After Prior Attachment of Rs. 1.60 Crore Worth Goods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34065</link>
      <description>Detention of goods with vehicle - subsequently order of attachment was passed - is detention justified? - the department has already attached other goods worth &amp;#8377; 1.60 crores, lying in the petitioner&#039;s godown. Additional attachment of the consignment of the goods in question therefore would not be necessary. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:57:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>