<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1422 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition, finding no merit in the Petitioners&#039; claims. It held that the actions of FMO and its Nominee Directors were in compliance with the contractual agreements, including the Articles of Association and Debenture Agreements. The Petitioners were directed to pay exemplary costs for filing a vexatious and frivolous petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:57:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1422 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition, finding no merit in the Petitioners&#039; claims. It held that the actions of FMO and its Nominee Directors were in compliance with the contractual agreements, including the Articles of Association and Debenture Agreements. The Petitioners were directed to pay exemplary costs for filing a vexatious and frivolous petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>