<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1410 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of Maaza Orange and Maaza Pineapple drinks under Tariff Heading 2202.99 due to the use of imported concentrates and the absence of proof of using fruit pulp or fruit juice in the manufacturing process. The appellant&#039;s failure to meet the conditions for exemption led to the imposition of duty, penalty, and interest, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1410 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of Maaza Orange and Maaza Pineapple drinks under Tariff Heading 2202.99 due to the use of imported concentrates and the absence of proof of using fruit pulp or fruit juice in the manufacturing process. The appellant&#039;s failure to meet the conditions for exemption led to the imposition of duty, penalty, and interest, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>