<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1403 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340900</link>
    <description>Prefabricated structures used to fabricate a cold room falling under Chapter 84 qualified for Cenvat credit as capital goods components under Rule 2(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The structures were used in the fabrication of capital goods, and credit could not be denied merely because they were themselves classifiable under Chapter 39. Credit was therefore admissible on the structures, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1403 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340900</link>
      <description>Prefabricated structures used to fabricate a cold room falling under Chapter 84 qualified for Cenvat credit as capital goods components under Rule 2(a) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The structures were used in the fabrication of capital goods, and credit could not be denied merely because they were themselves classifiable under Chapter 39. Credit was therefore admissible on the structures, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>