https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340898 The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal against the setting aside of demand, interest, and penalty by the Commissioner(Appeals) due to the failure to maintain separate accounts for common input services used for manufacturing dutiable and exempted products. The judgment highlighted the significance of Rule 6(3A) post-March 2008, emphasizing the adequacy of credit reversal for common inputs, and upheld the decision to annul the imposed liabilities based on legal interpretations and precedents. en-us Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340898 The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal against the setting aside of demand, interest, and penalty by the Commissioner(Appeals) due to the failure to maintain separate accounts for common input services used for manufacturing dutiable and exempted products. The judgment highlighted the significance of Rule 6(3A) post-March 2008, emphasizing the adequacy of credit reversal for common inputs, and upheld the decision to annul the imposed liabilities based on legal interpretations and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340898