https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340894 The court directed respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to promptly conclude the assessment proceedings for the imported Paper Machinery under the EPCG scheme. The petitioner's request to lift the alert in the EDI system was not pressed during the proceedings, with the focus shifting to expediting the assessment process. The court ordered a personal hearing, specified document requirements, and mandated a speaking order within eight weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the need for a timely resolution of the assessment process with procedural fairness and transparency. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:10:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340894 The court directed respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to promptly conclude the assessment proceedings for the imported Paper Machinery under the EPCG scheme. The petitioner's request to lift the alert in the EDI system was not pressed during the proceedings, with the focus shifting to expediting the assessment process. The court ordered a personal hearing, specified document requirements, and mandated a speaking order within eight weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the need for a timely resolution of the assessment process with procedural fairness and transparency. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340894