<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340893</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging tax authorities&#039; orders due to altered vehicle numbers, tampered documents, and tax evasion during the transport of goods. The Court upheld the tax authorities&#039; findings, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements. While denying costs, the Court allowed petitioners to submit proof of tax payment in other states for review by tax authorities, stressing the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:10:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340893</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging tax authorities&#039; orders due to altered vehicle numbers, tampered documents, and tax evasion during the transport of goods. The Court upheld the tax authorities&#039; findings, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements. While denying costs, the Court allowed petitioners to submit proof of tax payment in other states for review by tax authorities, stressing the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>