<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1376 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340873</link>
    <description>Freight income from voyages operated by a Danish shipping enterprise was analysed under the India-Denmark treaty and section 172 of the Income-tax Act. The material discussed the charter arrangement, ownership, residency documents and control factors to determine that the Danish entity was the freight beneficiary and that its business was managed from Denmark, with the Jordan entity acting only as charterer. On that basis, the treaty rule on profits from ships in international traffic was applied so that taxability depended on the place of effective management, with the stated effect that the income was not chargeable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:08:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1376 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340873</link>
      <description>Freight income from voyages operated by a Danish shipping enterprise was analysed under the India-Denmark treaty and section 172 of the Income-tax Act. The material discussed the charter arrangement, ownership, residency documents and control factors to determine that the Danish entity was the freight beneficiary and that its business was managed from Denmark, with the Jordan entity acting only as charterer. On that basis, the treaty rule on profits from ships in international traffic was applied so that taxability depended on the place of effective management, with the stated effect that the income was not chargeable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>