<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1375 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses incurred towards film advertisement and agricultural income, along with the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both issues. The issue of film distribution commission due to non-deduction of TDS was remitted back to the AO for verification. The disallowance of a percentage of distribution expenses was partially allowed, reducing it to 10%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1375 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenses incurred towards film advertisement and agricultural income, along with the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both issues. The issue of film distribution commission due to non-deduction of TDS was remitted back to the AO for verification. The disallowance of a percentage of distribution expenses was partially allowed, reducing it to 10%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>