<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1337 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191289</link>
    <description>The court disallowed the preliminary expenditure claimed by the assessee and upheld the disallowance of interest under Section 14A made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). However, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order, ruling that Section 14A does not apply if no exempt income was earned during the year. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, dismissing Ground No. 2.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1337 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191289</link>
      <description>The court disallowed the preliminary expenditure claimed by the assessee and upheld the disallowance of interest under Section 14A made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). However, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order, ruling that Section 14A does not apply if no exempt income was earned during the year. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, dismissing Ground No. 2.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>