<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 910 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191278</link>
    <description>A housing project may receive proportionate deduction for eligible units where it otherwise satisfies the statutory conditions, even if some units exceed the prescribed built-up area limit. The tribunal upheld the view that disallowance is confined to the non-qualifying units and does not defeat the deduction claim for the remaining compliant units. On the facts considered, the appellate authority&#039;s approach of excluding the oversized units while allowing deduction for the balance was found correct, and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:23:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 910 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191278</link>
      <description>A housing project may receive proportionate deduction for eligible units where it otherwise satisfies the statutory conditions, even if some units exceed the prescribed built-up area limit. The tribunal upheld the view that disallowance is confined to the non-qualifying units and does not defeat the deduction claim for the remaining compliant units. On the facts considered, the appellate authority&#039;s approach of excluding the oversized units while allowing deduction for the balance was found correct, and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>