https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191272 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Adjudicating Officer's order, citing the availability of an appeal remedy under Section 17 of FEMA. Emphasizing the importance of statutory forums for redressal of grievances, the court highlighted that a writ petition should not be entertained when an alternative efficacious remedy exists. The court referred to the principle in the Ratan case and dismissed the petition due to the existence of an appeal option under Section 35 of FEMA, granting the petitioner liberty to present arguments before the Appellate Authority in compliance with the law. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:49:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191272 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Adjudicating Officer's order, citing the availability of an appeal remedy under Section 17 of FEMA. Emphasizing the importance of statutory forums for redressal of grievances, the court highlighted that a writ petition should not be entertained when an alternative efficacious remedy exists. The court referred to the principle in the Ratan case and dismissed the petition due to the existence of an appeal option under Section 35 of FEMA, granting the petitioner liberty to present arguments before the Appellate Authority in compliance with the law. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191272