<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Proves Clandestine Removal Allegation Against Appellant Without Needing Precise Evidence Due to Evasion Tactics.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34027</link>
    <description>The allegation of clandestine removal has been established by the Revenue against the appellant. While the onus is on the Revenue to establish clandestine removal, they are not required to prove the case with mathematical precision as such a case involves deliberate and well thought out modus-operandi to evade duty. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:08:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:08:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Proves Clandestine Removal Allegation Against Appellant Without Needing Precise Evidence Due to Evasion Tactics.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34027</link>
      <description>The allegation of clandestine removal has been established by the Revenue against the appellant. While the onus is on the Revenue to establish clandestine removal, they are not required to prove the case with mathematical precision as such a case involves deliberate and well thought out modus-operandi to evade duty. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:08:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>