https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340862 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming service tax demand and penalties on the appellant for mining services. It held that the mining activities were wrongly taxed under different service categories without proper legal basis. Referring to legal provisions and precedents, the Tribunal found the tax demand and penalties to be incorrect, as the activities fell under the specific tax entry for mining services. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the appellant's work scope and relevant legal provisions, leading to the appeal's allowance and the previous order's annulment. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340862 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order confirming service tax demand and penalties on the appellant for mining services. It held that the mining activities were wrongly taxed under different service categories without proper legal basis. Referring to legal provisions and precedents, the Tribunal found the tax demand and penalties to be incorrect, as the activities fell under the specific tax entry for mining services. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the appellant's work scope and relevant legal provisions, leading to the appeal's allowance and the previous order's annulment. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340862