<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1363 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the order to exclude the demand for the extended period. The judgment clarified the admissibility of CENVAT credit for GTA services related to traded goods and addressed the issue of willful suppression of facts, upholding the demand and interest for the normal period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1363 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the order to exclude the demand for the extended period. The judgment clarified the admissibility of CENVAT credit for GTA services related to traded goods and addressed the issue of willful suppression of facts, upholding the demand and interest for the normal period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>