<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1356 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of providing the appellant with the opportunity to defend themselves based on the documents. The adjudicating authority was directed to dispose of the denovo adjudication proceedings within four months from the date of the order due to the case&#039;s age dating back to 2003.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1356 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of providing the appellant with the opportunity to defend themselves based on the documents. The adjudicating authority was directed to dispose of the denovo adjudication proceedings within four months from the date of the order due to the case&#039;s age dating back to 2003.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>