<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340847</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the charge of clandestine removal against the appellant, emphasizing the standard of evidence based on the preponderance of probability. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340847</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the charge of clandestine removal against the appellant, emphasizing the standard of evidence based on the preponderance of probability. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>