<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1349 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340846</link>
    <description>The rectification of mistake application filed by Sun Chemicals was allowed, modifying the order dated 17.10.2016. Following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the Vallabh Design Products case, the appeal was allowed, recognizing Sun Chemicals as a bona fide transferee of DEPB scrips obtained fraudulently. The court found an error apparent on the face of the record due to non-consideration of binding precedents, leading to the modification of the initial order on 8.3.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1349 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340846</link>
      <description>The rectification of mistake application filed by Sun Chemicals was allowed, modifying the order dated 17.10.2016. Following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the Vallabh Design Products case, the appeal was allowed, recognizing Sun Chemicals as a bona fide transferee of DEPB scrips obtained fraudulently. The court found an error apparent on the face of the record due to non-consideration of binding precedents, leading to the modification of the initial order on 8.3.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>