<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1341 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340838</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the suit, citing lack of territorial jurisdiction and maintainability issues. It emphasized the protection of journalistic reporting on judicial proceedings and absolute privilege in defamation cases related to FIRs and complaints. The decision aimed to prevent misuse of legal processes to harass defendants and uphold freedom of speech and fair reporting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1341 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340838</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the suit, citing lack of territorial jurisdiction and maintainability issues. It emphasized the protection of journalistic reporting on judicial proceedings and absolute privilege in defamation cases related to FIRs and complaints. The decision aimed to prevent misuse of legal processes to harass defendants and uphold freedom of speech and fair reporting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>