https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340837 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision to set aside the conviction of the first respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court held that the first notice demanding payment was valid, and the timing of the second notice was irrelevant. The first respondent was directed to deposit a specified amount as compensation, with the original conviction and sentence to be reinstated if the payment was not made. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340837 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision to set aside the conviction of the first respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court held that the first notice demanding payment was valid, and the timing of the second notice was irrelevant. The first respondent was directed to deposit a specified amount as compensation, with the original conviction and sentence to be reinstated if the payment was not made. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340837