<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1337 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340834</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the CIT&#039;s order regarding additional depreciation on windmills, as it had been previously decided in favor of the assessee. The Assessing Officer&#039;s allowance of additional depreciation and write-off of obsolete spares was deemed justified and not prejudicial to revenue, as the issues were adequately considered during assessment. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law to arise from the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1337 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340834</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the CIT&#039;s order regarding additional depreciation on windmills, as it had been previously decided in favor of the assessee. The Assessing Officer&#039;s allowance of additional depreciation and write-off of obsolete spares was deemed justified and not prejudicial to revenue, as the issues were adequately considered during assessment. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law to arise from the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>