<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by holding Short Term Capital Gains as Capital Gains and restricting the disallowance under Section 14A to the amount of exempt income earned. The issue of seeking a rebate under Section 88E was not addressed as the Tribunal classified the Short Term Capital Gains as Capital Gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by holding Short Term Capital Gains as Capital Gains and restricting the disallowance under Section 14A to the amount of exempt income earned. The issue of seeking a rebate under Section 88E was not addressed as the Tribunal classified the Short Term Capital Gains as Capital Gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>