<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1330 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) were invalid due to ambiguity in specifying the charge for penalty. The inconsistent use of charges by the Assessing Officer violated principles of natural justice. The penalties imposed for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09 were deleted, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed while the Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1330 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) were invalid due to ambiguity in specifying the charge for penalty. The inconsistent use of charges by the Assessing Officer violated principles of natural justice. The penalties imposed for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09 were deleted, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed while the Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>