<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1323 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, primarily due to the absence of incriminating material to support the additions made by the AO. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions and precedents, particularly regarding the jurisdiction under section 153A and the necessity for incriminating material to justify assessments and additions in income tax cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1323 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, primarily due to the absence of incriminating material to support the additions made by the AO. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions and precedents, particularly regarding the jurisdiction under section 153A and the necessity for incriminating material to justify assessments and additions in income tax cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>