<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1310 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the cooperative credit society, setting aside the penalty of Rs. 21,50,000 imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act for accepting cash deposits exceeding Rs. 20,000 in violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal found that the society had demonstrated a reasonable cause for the unintentional breach, citing precedents and CBDT guidelines. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 07:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1310 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the cooperative credit society, setting aside the penalty of Rs. 21,50,000 imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act for accepting cash deposits exceeding Rs. 20,000 in violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal found that the society had demonstrated a reasonable cause for the unintentional breach, citing precedents and CBDT guidelines. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>