<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1308 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee had successfully established the identity, creditworthiness of shareholders, and genuineness of transactions, providing all necessary documentary evidence. The AO&#039;s addition of undisclosed income was deemed unwarranted and lacking procedural fairness. Relying on judicial precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the addition should be deleted. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the disputed addition was removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1308 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee had successfully established the identity, creditworthiness of shareholders, and genuineness of transactions, providing all necessary documentary evidence. The AO&#039;s addition of undisclosed income was deemed unwarranted and lacking procedural fairness. Relying on judicial precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the addition should be deleted. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the disputed addition was removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>