<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1307 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, granting the deduction under section 80IB(10) to the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that delays caused by municipal authorities should not penalize the assessee, and the project was completed within the required timeframe. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1307 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, granting the deduction under section 80IB(10) to the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that delays caused by municipal authorities should not penalize the assessee, and the project was completed within the required timeframe. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>