<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1300 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340797</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad partly allowed the appeal by deleting the addition made on account of low Gross Profit as the fall in profit was not adequately explained. However, the additions related to personal use of electricity by a partner of the firm and the disallowance of general expenses were confirmed. The tribunal stressed the need for sufficient explanations and evidence in tax assessments to prevent such additions and disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1300 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340797</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad partly allowed the appeal by deleting the addition made on account of low Gross Profit as the fall in profit was not adequately explained. However, the additions related to personal use of electricity by a partner of the firm and the disallowance of general expenses were confirmed. The tribunal stressed the need for sufficient explanations and evidence in tax assessments to prevent such additions and disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>