<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 972 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191259</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found. The Tribunal found that the amount deposited for minor sons of partners was fictitious, and alleged gifts to minors were not proven with evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 972 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191259</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found. The Tribunal found that the amount deposited for minor sons of partners was fictitious, and alleged gifts to minors were not proven with evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>