<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7245</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Travancore Income-tax Act remained governed by section 47 despite the coming into force of section 13 of the Finance Act, 1950, because the saving provision preserved the existing law for levy, assessment and collection for the relevant periods. Section 47(1) allowed notice and reassessment within eight years in concealment cases, and section 47(2) supplied the outer limitation framework by reference to such cases. The saved provisions were treated as including the reassessment machinery applicable to concealment matters, and the reasoning used in the saved-penalty context was applied equally to reassessment. The reassessments were therefore within time and the assessee failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7245</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Travancore Income-tax Act remained governed by section 47 despite the coming into force of section 13 of the Finance Act, 1950, because the saving provision preserved the existing law for levy, assessment and collection for the relevant periods. Section 47(1) allowed notice and reassessment within eight years in concealment cases, and section 47(2) supplied the outer limitation framework by reference to such cases. The saved provisions were treated as including the reassessment machinery applicable to concealment matters, and the reasoning used in the saved-penalty context was applied equally to reassessment. The reassessments were therefore within time and the assessee failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>