<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 909 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, sustaining an addition of &amp;amp;8377; 11,40,000 as undisclosed bank account deposits for the assessment year 2007-08 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered peak credit and personal expenses paid, differing from the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, which had restricted the addition to &amp;amp;8377; 15,32,778. The order was pronounced on 11-01-2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 909 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, sustaining an addition of &amp;amp;8377; 11,40,000 as undisclosed bank account deposits for the assessment year 2007-08 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered peak credit and personal expenses paid, differing from the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, which had restricted the addition to &amp;amp;8377; 15,32,778. The order was pronounced on 11-01-2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>