<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1002 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191256</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. It concluded that the respondent&#039;s raising of funds through bonds and subsequent deployment for infrastructure projects constituted the commencement of business. Therefore, the interest income earned on the deposited funds was rightly classified as income from business, entitling the respondent to all applicable deductions in the computation of business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:17:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1002 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191256</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. It concluded that the respondent&#039;s raising of funds through bonds and subsequent deployment for infrastructure projects constituted the commencement of business. Therefore, the interest income earned on the deposited funds was rightly classified as income from business, entitling the respondent to all applicable deductions in the computation of business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>