https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191255 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA is sustained where the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction is supported by material showing continuing propensity for smuggling, and the record is read as a whole. Retention of an explanatory paragraph in the detention order did not show non-application of mind because it was inserted to secure translation, sealing and timely service of documents. A partially blurred page did not defeat Article 22(5) where the relied-upon material remained legible enough for an effective representation. An explained time gap did not snap the live link, no fatal variance existed between the detention order and grounds, and bail status alone did not bar preventive detention. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191255 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA is sustained where the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction is supported by material showing continuing propensity for smuggling, and the record is read as a whole. Retention of an explanatory paragraph in the detention order did not show non-application of mind because it was inserted to secure translation, sealing and timely service of documents. A partially blurred page did not defeat Article 22(5) where the relied-upon material remained legible enough for an effective representation. An explained time gap did not snap the live link, no fatal variance existed between the detention order and grounds, and bail status alone did not bar preventive detention. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191255