<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1284 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340781</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as non-maintainable under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the Tribunal&#039;s order addressing issues concerning the rate of duty and value of goods. The court highlighted the importance of consolidating appeals to prevent conflicting outcomes and procedural complexities. The duty demands and penalties imposed on the assessees were confirmed, with some demands set aside by the Tribunal based on lack of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1284 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340781</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as non-maintainable under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the Tribunal&#039;s order addressing issues concerning the rate of duty and value of goods. The court highlighted the importance of consolidating appeals to prevent conflicting outcomes and procedural complexities. The duty demands and penalties imposed on the assessees were confirmed, with some demands set aside by the Tribunal based on lack of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>