<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340776</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in an appeal by the Revenue concerning alleged clandestine removal of iron and steel products. While a demand of &amp;amp;8377;1,98,921.00 was confirmed based on recovered evidence, larger demands were dropped due to insufficient evidence linking weighment slips to actual removals. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence and corroboration in such cases, affirming the importance of thorough investigations to substantiate claims of clandestine removal of goods. The appeal was rejected, highlighting the significance of strong evidentiary support in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1279 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340776</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in an appeal by the Revenue concerning alleged clandestine removal of iron and steel products. While a demand of &amp;amp;8377;1,98,921.00 was confirmed based on recovered evidence, larger demands were dropped due to insufficient evidence linking weighment slips to actual removals. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence and corroboration in such cases, affirming the importance of thorough investigations to substantiate claims of clandestine removal of goods. The appeal was rejected, highlighting the significance of strong evidentiary support in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>