<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1273 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340770</link>
    <description>Assessment and penalty under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act based on web report mismatch could not be sustained where the dealer was not furnished full details and no personal hearing was shown before adverse action. The Court applied its earlier batch ruling on mismatch assessments, which required a centralized mechanism, proper consultation, and a fair opportunity to the dealer before any adverse assessment. Because the impugned order did not reflect such hearing or enquiry, it was set aside and remitted to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration in accordance with the earlier directions and after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1273 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340770</link>
      <description>Assessment and penalty under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act based on web report mismatch could not be sustained where the dealer was not furnished full details and no personal hearing was shown before adverse action. The Court applied its earlier batch ruling on mismatch assessments, which required a centralized mechanism, proper consultation, and a fair opportunity to the dealer before any adverse assessment. Because the impugned order did not reflect such hearing or enquiry, it was set aside and remitted to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration in accordance with the earlier directions and after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>