https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340769 The High Court of Delhi held that the Company Court maintains exclusive jurisdiction to decide on applications under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, for reviving a company in provisional liquidation, despite the 07.12.2016 notification. The applications for the revival of the respondent company will not be transferred to the NCLT and will remain under the Company Court's jurisdiction. The court deemed these revival proceedings as "proceedings relating to winding up," affirming the Company Court's exclusive authority over them. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340769 The High Court of Delhi held that the Company Court maintains exclusive jurisdiction to decide on applications under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, for reviving a company in provisional liquidation, despite the 07.12.2016 notification. The applications for the revival of the respondent company will not be transferred to the NCLT and will remain under the Company Court's jurisdiction. The court deemed these revival proceedings as "proceedings relating to winding up," affirming the Company Court's exclusive authority over them. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340769