<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1269 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340766</link>
    <description>Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 governs bail for Part A scheduled offences and overrides the general bail power under Section 439 CrPC; the Court applied the amended statutory scheme as it stood at the time of consideration and rejected reliance on the earlier Part B position. On merits, prima facie material showed foreign transfers into family members&#039; accounts through banking and hawala-linked channels, and the statutory presumption under Section 24 placed the burden on the applicant to show untainted property. That burden was not discharged at the bail stage, so bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1269 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340766</link>
      <description>Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 governs bail for Part A scheduled offences and overrides the general bail power under Section 439 CrPC; the Court applied the amended statutory scheme as it stood at the time of consideration and rejected reliance on the earlier Part B position. On merits, prima facie material showed foreign transfers into family members&#039; accounts through banking and hawala-linked channels, and the statutory presumption under Section 24 placed the burden on the applicant to show untainted property. That burden was not discharged at the bail stage, so bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>