<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1255 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340752</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal regarding jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2004-05. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on the Commissioner&#039;s powers under Section 263. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment favored the appellant&#039;s right to claim additional depreciation, aligning with previous decisions. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim additional depreciation during the specific assessment year, allowing the right to carry forward balance additional depreciation to the subsequent year. The appeal was allowed without costs, maintaining the Tribunal&#039;s decision on other issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:44:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1255 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340752</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal regarding jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2004-05. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on the Commissioner&#039;s powers under Section 263. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment favored the appellant&#039;s right to claim additional depreciation, aligning with previous decisions. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim additional depreciation during the specific assessment year, allowing the right to carry forward balance additional depreciation to the subsequent year. The appeal was allowed without costs, maintaining the Tribunal&#039;s decision on other issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>