<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1252 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340749</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the change of status of the assessee from a co-operative society to a company without a reasoned order was impermissible under the law. Issues regarding unrealized interest, disallowances under Section 154, rectification orders for bad debts, and deductions under Section 36(1)(viia) were deemed debatable and not suitable for rectification. The court emphasized that such issues should be addressed during regular assessments or reassessments, rather than through Section 154 rectifications. The application and appeal were dismissed as no substantial question of law was found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1252 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340749</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the change of status of the assessee from a co-operative society to a company without a reasoned order was impermissible under the law. Issues regarding unrealized interest, disallowances under Section 154, rectification orders for bad debts, and deductions under Section 36(1)(viia) were deemed debatable and not suitable for rectification. The court emphasized that such issues should be addressed during regular assessments or reassessments, rather than through Section 154 rectifications. The application and appeal were dismissed as no substantial question of law was found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>