<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1249 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, modifying the CIT&#039;s order and directing the AO to conduct a fresh inquiry on the receipt of share capital and share premium after affording the Assessee an opportunity to be heard. The Tribunal found that the CIT should have directed a fresh inquiry by the AO instead of adding the amount as unexplained cash credit, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into transactions before acceptance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:43:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1249 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, modifying the CIT&#039;s order and directing the AO to conduct a fresh inquiry on the receipt of share capital and share premium after affording the Assessee an opportunity to be heard. The Tribunal found that the CIT should have directed a fresh inquiry by the AO instead of adding the amount as unexplained cash credit, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into transactions before acceptance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>