<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1205 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191248</link>
    <description>Under the VAT regime, liability on works contracts attaches to the value of goods at the time of incorporation, and receipt of consideration does not postpone the charge; deductions under rule 17(1)(e) operate within that scheme, not as a shift in the charging point. Pure labour contracts remain outside VAT, but whether a contract is purely labour or includes material transfer is a factual question. Forfeiture of tax collected at source requires notice and a hearing before action is taken. The same transaction cannot be taxed twice, and protection may be needed where later-year tax payment could overlap with earlier incorporation-based assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1205 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191248</link>
      <description>Under the VAT regime, liability on works contracts attaches to the value of goods at the time of incorporation, and receipt of consideration does not postpone the charge; deductions under rule 17(1)(e) operate within that scheme, not as a shift in the charging point. Pure labour contracts remain outside VAT, but whether a contract is purely labour or includes material transfer is a factual question. Forfeiture of tax collected at source requires notice and a hearing before action is taken. The same transaction cannot be taxed twice, and protection may be needed where later-year tax payment could overlap with earlier incorporation-based assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>