https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191249 Preventive detention requires a real and proximate connection between alleged prejudicial activity and the need for immediate detention. Unexplained delay in executing a detention order, despite knowledge of the detenu's whereabouts, undermines the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction and can vitiate detention. Article 22(5) requires relied-upon material to be supplied in a usable form that enables an effective representation. Where detention grounds substantially rely on CCTV footage, providing CDs without a workable viewing facility, together with illegible documents, denies that constitutional safeguard. Non-placement of transfer information is not independently vitiating where the authorities already possessed that information. en-us Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2026 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191249 Preventive detention requires a real and proximate connection between alleged prejudicial activity and the need for immediate detention. Unexplained delay in executing a detention order, despite knowledge of the detenu's whereabouts, undermines the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction and can vitiate detention. Article 22(5) requires relied-upon material to be supplied in a usable form that enables an effective representation. Where detention grounds substantially rely on CCTV footage, providing CDs without a workable viewing facility, together with illegible documents, denies that constitutional safeguard. Non-placement of transfer information is not independently vitiating where the authorities already possessed that information. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191249