<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1172 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deduction of legal fees paid to a London firm and the premium for professional indemnity insurance. It found the legal fee payment was genuine for software protection, allowing it under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal accepted the payment method and the director&#039;s payment from personal funds. Regarding the insurance premium, it deemed the payment legitimate as part of the legal fees to prevent software misuse, despite the legal firm&#039;s obligation under UK law. The Tribunal affirmed both deductions, finding no grounds to overturn the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1172 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deduction of legal fees paid to a London firm and the premium for professional indemnity insurance. It found the legal fee payment was genuine for software protection, allowing it under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal accepted the payment method and the director&#039;s payment from personal funds. Regarding the insurance premium, it deemed the payment legitimate as part of the legal fees to prevent software misuse, despite the legal firm&#039;s obligation under UK law. The Tribunal affirmed both deductions, finding no grounds to overturn the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>