<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (3) TMI 44 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191236</link>
    <description>Failure to comply fully with a notice requiring production of account books can justify a best judgment assessment under section 23(4), even where the assessee produced books for the relevant year, because the Income-tax Officer may require earlier years&#039; books to verify the return. Prior acceptance of an explanation for loss of books does not operate as res judicata or estoppel in later income-tax years; it may be departed from where the earlier acceptance was not reached after due enquiry or where fresh material supports a different view. A challenge to the estimated quantum raises no question of law unless it was properly raised before the Tribunal and in the reference application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (3) TMI 44 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191236</link>
      <description>Failure to comply fully with a notice requiring production of account books can justify a best judgment assessment under section 23(4), even where the assessee produced books for the relevant year, because the Income-tax Officer may require earlier years&#039; books to verify the return. Prior acceptance of an explanation for loss of books does not operate as res judicata or estoppel in later income-tax years; it may be departed from where the earlier acceptance was not reached after due enquiry or where fresh material supports a different view. A challenge to the estimated quantum raises no question of law unless it was properly raised before the Tribunal and in the reference application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>