<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191235</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI denied the Revenue&#039;s application for stay of the impugned order. It was held that the respondents, who only operate a weigh bridge to weigh goods, do not fall under &#039;business auxiliary service&#039; as per the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal ruled that the act of weighing goods does not meet the criteria for &#039;business auxiliary service&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191235</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI denied the Revenue&#039;s application for stay of the impugned order. It was held that the respondents, who only operate a weigh bridge to weigh goods, do not fall under &#039;business auxiliary service&#039; as per the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal ruled that the act of weighing goods does not meet the criteria for &#039;business auxiliary service&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>